Vertex Views

Tag: Economy

  • How Inflation Changes Our Psychology

    Inflation isn’t just numbers on a chart. It’s not some boring economic phenomenon reserved for finance bros and economists who get aroused by spreadsheets.

    Inflation messes with your mind.
    Your mood.
    Your confidence.
    Your entire relationship with money, life, and the future.

    It’s basically the universe’s way of saying, “Hey buddy, remember that sense of stability you used to have? Yeah… I’m gonna take that from you.”

    Let’s unpack the psychological circus inflation creates, without the jargon and with all the uncomfortable truths.

    Inflation Turns Us Into Paranoid Squirrels

    When prices go up, your brain goes into scarcity mode.

    Suddenly:

    • You feel like you never have enough.
    • You panic when you spend.
    • You hoard stupid things you don’t need (yes, even you, bulk cereal shopper).
    • You question every life decision, including why you bought that overpriced coffee last week.

    Inflation shrinks your sense of security, even if your income hasn’t changed yet.
    Your mind reacts before your bank account does.

    That’s the power of uncertainty — it doesn’t just threaten your wallet, it threatens your survival instincts.

    It Makes You Feel Poorer Than You Actually Are

    Even if you’re making decent money, inflation whispers,
    “You’re falling behind, loser.”

    Your purchasing power drops, your savings look useless, and you suddenly feel like the world is speeding up while you’re stuck in traffic.

    It’s not just financial loss, it’s psychological erosion.
    It chips away at your sense of progress.

    Humans love feeling like they’re moving forward.
    Inflation makes it feel like you’re running on a treadmill made of wet cement.

    Inflation Breaks the Illusion of Control

    We like to pretend we’re in control of our lives.
    But inflation?
    It’s the middle finger of the universe.

    You can budget perfectly, save diligently, invest wisely — and still feel screwed.

    That’s the part that messes with your head.
    Your brain craves predictability.
    Inflation is unpredictability wearing a clown costume.

    When you lose control, you don’t just lose money, you lose psychological stability.

    Your Brain Starts Playing the Blame Game

    When the world feels unstable, your mind looks for villains.

    So you blame:

    • the government
    • the economy
    • your boss
    • Big Business
    • avocado toast
    • maybe even your ex (why not?)

    Inflation triggers emotional reactions, not rational ones.
    Anger gives you a target when the real problem is systemic and faceless.

    It’s easier to blame a person than a macroeconomic trend.

    Inflation Makes You More Risk-Averse (or Stupidly Risky)

    There are two psychological extremes inflation pushes you into:

    A. Fear Mode
    You stop spending.
    You stop investing.
    You stop doing anything that feels risky.
    Basically, you curl into a financial fetal position.

    B. YOLO Mode
    Screw it. The world is burning anyway.
    Let me buy a new phone, trade crypto, start a business, or move to Bali.

    Inflation creates an emotional pendulum between dread and delusion.

    The worst part?
    Both extremes can hurt you.

    You Start Comparing Yourself to Everyone (and Always Lose)

    Inflation messes with your identity.
    You stop asking,
    “What do I need?”
    and start asking,
    “What do others have that I don’t?”

    Comparison becomes your new coping mechanism.

    The rich?
    They’re fine.
    The middle class?
    Panicking quietly.
    The lower-income group?
    Getting crushed.

    Suddenly your self-worth becomes tied to your economic rank — real or imagined.

    Inflation doesn’t just inflate prices.
    It inflates insecurities.

    Inflation Turns the Future Into a Horror Movie

    Your sense of hope shrinks.
    Your optimism deflates like a punctured balloon.

    You start thinking:

    • “Will I ever afford a home?”
    • “Will my savings even matter?”
    • “Will my salary catch up?”
    • “Should I move to Canada?” (It always comes back to Canada.)

    Inflation makes the future scary because it attacks the foundation of modern life: predictability.
    And humans fear uncertain futures more than painful presents.

    But Here’s the Twist: Inflation Can Also Make You Smarter

    Pain is a great teacher.
    And inflation is basically an economic slap to the face.

    It forces you to:

    • rethink your spending
    • learn how money actually works
    • invest instead of just save
    • build multiple income streams
    • question the bullshit myths you were raised with
    • get serious about financial literacy

    Inflation exposes your financial weak points, not to punish you, but to push you to evolve.

    So, What’s the Takeaway?

    Inflation isn’t just an economic phenomenon.
    It’s a psychological earthquake.

    It rattles your security.
    It distorts your perception.
    It rewires your behavior.
    It magnifies your fears.
    It challenges your identity.

    But it can also reshape you into someone sharper.
    More aware.
    More intentional.
    More financially mature.

    Inflation might make life harder — but it also forces you to grow up financially.
    And sometimes that’s exactly what you need.

    Even if it feels like the universe is charging you extra for everything, including your mental peace.

  • The United States seeks to deduct government expenditures from GDP

    The total worth of products and services produced by a nation over a specific period is known as its gross domestic product or GDP.

    Governments, historically, have messed with GDP. They count government spending as part of GDP. So I’m going to separate those two and make it transparent… If the government buys a tank, that’s GDP. But paying 1,000 people to think about buying a tank is not GDP — that is wasted inefficiency, wasted money, and cutting that, while it shows in GDP, we’re going to get rid of that, we’re going to show you how that is

    A few days ago, it was US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. To put it simply, Lutnick thinks it’s a terrible idea to include government spending in GDP statistics. And removing it from the equation is his answer.

    He makes a straightforward argument. Real economic growth is not necessarily correlated with government spending. Therefore, wasteful spending shouldn’t be included in GDP calculations.

    It makes sense, doesn’t it? However, is this concept viable?

    We must first comprehend the rationale behind including government spending in GDP to determine that. Furthermore, the solution isn’t as difficult as it seems. The total worth of products and services produced by a nation over a specific period is known as its gross domestic product or GDP. Additionally, if you were to deconstruct it into a formula, it would be like this:

    GDP = Consumer Spending + Business Investment + Government Spending + Net Exports

    (Net exports = Total Exports – Total Imports)

    In other words, every component of the equation represents actual economic activity. GDP ceases to provide the complete picture if any one of them is eliminated.

    But let’s concentrate on the portion of the equation that deals with government spending. What happens if the government employs a group of individuals to do nothing? Let them fidget with their thumbs all day. Yes, in theory, GDP would increase. But will the economy benefit from that? Except for the pro-thumb-twiddlers, not really.

    This is not merely a speculative case that we thought of. Both Elon Musk and Lutnick have alluded to this possibility. The case for reducing wasteful government spending from GDP begins to make sense at this point.

    This is supported by a National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) research. It was discovered that a 1% decrease in primary spending by governments in the OECD nations included in the sample resulted in an almost instantaneous 0.16% increase in the investments to GDP ratio. This effect compounded to 0.8% during five years. Furthermore, the impact was much greater—2.77% over five years, to be exact—if the budget cuts were directed towards reducing government salaries.

    What causes this to occur? Easy. Governments frequently increase employment when they increase spending. Pay increases as a result. Businesses incur higher costs as a result of higher wages in the private sector. Profits decline as a result, and businesses make fewer investments in expansion. Additionally, this slows down the economy over time.

    This has happened to us previously. Consider the financial crisis of 2008. The US government increased expenditure by 11% to $3 trillion to stabilise the economy. This kept things afloat in the short run. However, it ultimately resulted in weaker economic development, increased debt, and higher interest rates.

    Then, keep in mind that governments do not produce all of their money on their own. Through taxes, they receive a portion from us, the businesses and consumers. They borrow money if that is insufficient to finance their plans. Therefore, when the government spends, it is only moving a portion of that money around rather than creating new revenue in its entirety.  Additionally, spending doesn’t contribute much to economic growth if it isn’t productive.

    The United States may be thinking, “Hey, inefficient government spending is a huge problem,” for that reason. So let’s just label it a fix and remove it from GDP.

    But, you wonder, does that resolve anything?

    Not exactly. Because taking government expenditure out of GDP could not enhance economic data, but rather distort it.

    To put things in perspective, 20% of the US GDP is spent by the government. Without it, it is almost hard to compare the US economy to those of other nations. Since government investment stimulates economic activity, particularly in sectors like infrastructure, healthcare, and education, every country incorporates it in its GDP calculation. These support long-term growth rather than being merely expenses. 

    Yes, certain government spending is inefficient. However, doesn’t that also apply to consumer spending? 

    Simply consider it. $100 million is spent by a film studio on a bad movie. The film fails.  However, because tickets were purchased, that money is still included in GDP statistics. An excessive number of poor films could eventually harm the business. However, that does not imply that we deduct this expenditure from GDP, does it?

    So why is government spending subject to a separate rule?

    What if we concentrated on evaluating the quality of government expenditure rather than subtracting it from GDP?

    Well, the Quality of Public Expenditure Index is an existing mechanism in India that measures expenditure efficiency.  To assess whether public spending is effective or simply wasteful, the RBI keeps track of it going back to 1991.

    This is how it operates.

    It starts by examining the expenditures, such as infrastructure development, training and education funding, R&D, and healthcare investments. A government’s spending quality improves as it makes more investments in these.

    It then calculates the amount of interest that has accrued on the obligation. Interest payments are a good measure of financial discipline even though they aren’t included in GDP. Maintaining this low indicates prudent government spending.

    Lastly, it monitors two important figures: the revenue deficit (the difference between regular income and costs) and the fiscal deficit (the amount borrowed by the government to pay for excessive spending). According to the RBI, maintaining a revenue deficit of zero and a fiscal deficit of three percent guarantees high-quality public spending.

    This index has shown to be a helpful tool for determining whether spending is headed in the right direction. Additionally, for the past few years, the trend has been upward.

    Perhaps the United States could also learn from this example.

    Better yet, consider its own history. In the past, the US government had a structure in place to use actual data and evidence to gauge how effective its initiatives were. Political divisions may prevent the current administration from agreeing with that strategy, but that doesn’t mean they can’t create something better. They may collaborate with economists, improve on outdated frameworks, and develop a model that accurately depicts how successfully or poorly federal funds are being used.

    Because let’s face it. Not only is it misleading, but it is downright strange to exclude government spending from GDP calculations. And generating concepts that don’t make sense economically?  That could hurt the US economy.

    And the majority of economists would advise against that.

    What are your thoughts?

  • Can UP Save India’s Top Spot as a Mango Exporter?

    Many Indian mango varieties, including Alphonso, Dasheri, Chausa, and Langra—many of which are also grown in Uttar Pradesh—have been covertly cultivated in China.

    An astounding 20 million tonnes of mangoes are grown in India annually. Furthermore, we produce by far the most mangoes worldwide.

    Even with our dominance, we export less than 0.5% of our total production. Even Pakistan’s Mango exports are higher than ours!

    You could assume, however, that it’s because we cherish our mangoes too much to part with them. And in some ways, you would be correct. We consume the most mangoes worldwide because we eat so many of them!

    But, that is only part of the story. Our exports are so low because of our fondness for mangoes alone. There is a more serious issue at hand. As you can see, UP is a mango-producing powerhouse, yielding about 5 million tonnes annually. That represents more than 25% of all mangos produced in India. Its export contribution isn’t as noteworthy, though.

    It’s easy to understand because Mangoes grown in Uttar Pradesh cannot be preserved for export.

    Mangoes are fragile fruits, particularly the Indian kinds. They need some gentle loving care on long voyages because their skin is thinner than that of varieties from Mexico or Brazil. Additionally, before they are prepared for export, they must undergo radiation treatment to eradicate bacteria and pests and be kept fresh. This process involves storing the products in dry, temperature-controlled facilities.

    And that’s when the issue gets worse. Although UP has some excellent mango varieties, it doesn’t have the infrastructure to keep them fresher longer. Thus, before its mangoes can be exported, they must be sent to places like Bengaluru or Mumbai, where there are radiation treatment plants. Imagine now what transpires on that excursion. After harvest, these mangoes don’t usually last more than two days or two weeks. Additionally, the likelihood of spoiling increases by the time they reach these places. This extra transportation also results in increased expenses.

    And this is the issue. For these mangoes to swiftly reach distant markets like the US or Europe, they must be flown by air. Cheaper delivery options are just not viable. So, when expenses mount, the mango export industry becomes significantly less profitable.

    To make matters worse, producers may resort to using pesticides and chemicals that are prohibited to extend the shelf life of their mangoes as a result of this delay. However, there are stringent rules in place in the worldwide markets, particularly in the US and Europe, and any trace of these compounds could result in the rejection of entire consignments.

    Thus, we are not only having infrastructure problems, but we are also endangering our standing as a trustworthy exporter.

    And who stands to gain from our hardships, you ask?

    None other than China, that is.

    Yes!

    Many Indian mango varieties, including Alphonso, Dasheri, Chausa, and Langra—many of which are also grown in Uttar Pradesh—have been covertly cultivated in China. And for the last two years, China has outpaced India in mango exports, believe it or not. For background, China exported $59 million worth of mangoes in 2023, which is almost 6% more than India exported in the same year.

    And here’s the kicker. We may be partly to blame for some of this.

    It’s not simply that our mango growers have trouble keeping their fruit fresher longer. It all stems from an amicable diplomatic ploy that India made to China in the 1950s.

    China’s exports and mango cultivation weren’t always as successful. But, things turned amicable in 1955. As a show of goodwill toward his Chinese counterpart, the Indian Prime Minister at the time sent eight mango saplings of the Alphonso, Dasheri, Chausa, and Langra types. For the two spotted deer, red-crested cranes, and 100 goldfish that China had provided us, it was a charming return gift.

    But, this friendship was short-lived. Relations deteriorated because of wars and border conflicts. And those young mango trees? They might have flourished in the southern Chinese provinces of Hainan and Guangdong, where the climate is ideal for growing mangoes. Years later, though, that diplomatic favour is now biting us in the rear as Chinese mango exports are eating into our own!

    Yet, India—more especially, Uttar Pradesh—isn’t prepared to give up just yet. The infrastructure is the first to be targeted as the state gets ready for a mango revolution.

    The UP government said last week that it would be constructing the first radiation treatment plant in North India close to the Jewar International Airport, which is located outside of Noida. Using the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model is how it is being done. It does make perfect sense. UP can expedite the export process, cut delays, lower expenses, and ease access to major markets such as the US and Europe by situating the facility near a major transportation hub.

    The state is not going to stop there. It also intends to highlight the many health advantages of its aesthetically pleasing red mango variety. These fruits, which are high in antioxidants, are being promoted as a means of preventing obesity and age-related cognitive decline. This marketing strategy may appeal to consumers worldwide who are concerned about their health.

    However, this is not UP’s first endeavour to enhance its export of mangos.

    The government made it simpler for farmers to trim their mango trees without obtaining authorization a few months ago. Currently, pruning is the act of removing portions of the tree to promote healthy growth. Although it may seem like a little change, this is crucial for older mango farms. Farmers can better control their trees’ canopy—the upper, leafy part of the tree—by routinely pruning the trees. Furthermore, this may eventually result in improved fruit quality for export and increased mango harvests.

    Thus, UP may soon reverse the trend for India’s mango exports. The timing is also ideal since Indian mango growers and trade associations are already bullish about 2024 and intend to surpass China in mango exports. To put things in perspective, India exported $49 million worth of fresh mangoes by May of this year, which is more than the country exported in 2022!

    Will it be enough to help India become a more formidable exporter of mangos?

    We sincerely hope so. As with any fine mango, though, we’ll have to wait and see just how sweet the result is.

  • Does Banking Culture Promote Cheating?

    Experts believe the banking sector may be promoting dishonesty by focusing too much on profit

    Is there anything about banking that encourages dishonest behaviour? Yes, according to Swiss researchers. 

    They found that the banking culture, which focuses on financial gain, can lead to dishonesty. Nature magazine surveyed 128 employees from a large international bank and 80 others from various lenders. The bankers were split into two groups and asked to answer a short quiz about their work and personal lives.

    The participants were split into two groups. One group answered questions about their banking jobs, while the other group was asked about their TV-watching habits, which was the control group. Both groups then performed coin flips, which were unmonitored. The bankers were told they could earn money based on the number of heads they flipped, with a maximum reward of $200 for a full sequence of heads. This setup aimed to observe any differences in honesty between the two groups.

    The control group had a 52% success rate in the coin tosses. The first group, which answered questions about their banking jobs, reported a 58% success rate. Researchers concluded that 26% of the first group cheated. The 58% success rate was significantly higher than that of the control group and above what would be expected by chance.

    In a follow-up study with non-bankers, dishonesty didn’t increase when participants were asked about their professions before the coin tosses. Unlike the bankers, workers in other industries didn’t show more cheating when reminded of their professional roles. This suggests that banking’s focus on profit might be a unique factor encouraging dishonesty.

    The same was true for students — they didn’t cheat more when given financial prompts.

    So, what’s going on? Experts believe the banking sector may be promoting dishonesty by focusing too much on profit.

    This raises concerns about the values of banking culture. If integrity keeps taking a back seat to profit, it could damage public trust. A shift in the industry’s culture might be necessary to promote ethical behaviour in finance.

  • Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: What It Means for Your Business

    RCEP aims to streamline customs procedures and reduce delays.

    The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is basically a massive trade agreement between 15 countries, including powerhouses like China, Japan, and Australia. If you’re running a business and still thinking, “Why should I care?”—let’s dive into why RCEP matters to you.

    First off, RCEP is the largest trade bloc in the world. We’re talking about a third of the global economy here. What this means is more access to a vast market without the usual headaches of high tariffs and complicated trade barriers. In simple terms: cheaper imports, easier exports, and a lot less red tape. Imagine being able to import materials at a lower cost, sell your product in new markets, and keep more of your profits. That’s the dream, right?

    But it’s not all sunshine and rainbows. With the floodgates open to cheap imports, your competition just got a whole lot bigger and nastier. If your business relies on local goods or services that are suddenly being undercut by cheaper imports, you’ve got to rethink your strategy—fast. It’s time to up your game, whether that’s improving quality, cutting costs, or finding your unique selling point that no foreign competitor can replicate.

    Another perk? Supply chains just got smoother. RCEP aims to streamline customs procedures and reduce delays. So if you’ve ever had to deal with shipping delays or got stuck in paperwork hell, this is good news. Faster and cheaper logistics can give your business a much-needed edge, especially in industries where speed is crucial.

    But here’s the kicker: RCEP also comes with a layer of unpredictability. It’s a new playground, and the rules of engagement will keep evolving. Staying nimble and keeping an eye on policy changes will be key. Don’t get too comfortable because today’s advantage could be tomorrow’s setback.

    So, what’s the bottom line? RCEP is a game-changer. It’s an opportunity to expand, reduce costs, and streamline operations. But it also means stiffer competition and a rapidly shifting landscape. The smart move? Embrace the benefits but keep your business agile and prepared to pivot when needed.

    In the end, RCEP is like getting access to a bigger, shinier sandbox—but the sandcastles you’re up against just got a whole lot taller. Whether you end up winning or losing in this new setup depends entirely on how well you play the game. So, get out there, adapt, and don’t let the new competition catch you napping.