Vertex Views

Tag: viral

  • Why Consumers Are Boycotting Brands Today

    A group of protesters holding signs such as 'BOYCOTT!' and 'STOP GREENWASHING' in front of a tall building, with a pile of rubbish and recycling bins nearby. Smoke rises from the buildings in the background, under a dramatic sunset sky.

    There was a time when boycotting a brand meant something. People marched. They printed flyers. They wrote angry letters in fonts only typewriters love.
    Now? A boycott is one bad tweet away. One viral Instagram story. One “bro, this ain’t it” on TikTok.

    Welcome to the golden age of rage-shopping. We don’t buy things to make a point. Then, we loudly tell everyone that we didn’t buy them.

    But beneath all the memes, cancel hashtags, and moral grandstanding lies something real. There is something uncomfortable. There is something brands desperately hope you don’t notice. Most boycotts today are about sustainability, transparency, and ethical accountability. Brands are failing the vibe check.

    Let’s break it down.

    Why Boycotts Are Exploding (Hint: It’s Not Just Outrage Culture)

    Sure, outrage is fashionable. But a deeper force is at work. People are tired of brands talking about sustainability while treating the planet like a discount doormat.

    Every year, Gen Z and millennial consumers keep saying the same damn thing:
    “We want brands that give a damn.”
    And every year, brands reply:
    “We hear you… and here’s a new green-colored logo to prove it.”

    But consumers are done being played. They have receipts, literally. When a brand acts shady, a single viral thread can spark a boycott. It happens faster than you can say ‘eco-friendly packaging’.

    Exhibit A: H&M — Sustainability Theatre at Its Finest

    H&M once strutted into the sustainability spotlight with its “Conscious Collection,” as if it were Gandhi reincarnated.
    Then people discovered the clothes were barely more sustainable than regular lines. They were often made from the same synthetic junk.

    Cue:

    • Outrage
    • Investigations
    • A digital bonfire of H&M bags

    Lesson?
    Slapping ‘conscious’ on a clothing tag doesn’t make you sustainable. It makes you a target.

    Exhibit B: Starbucks — When Reusable Cups Aren’t Enough

    Starbucks loves promoting its “mission-driven brand identity.” Save the planet, save the mermaid, save your guilt by using a reusable cup.

    But then people discovered:

    • Mountains of waste behind stores
    • Single-use plastics everywhere
    • “Recycling” systems as functional as government paperwork

    Boycott trends hit social media harder than double-shot espresso.
    And honestly? Deserved.

    Lesson?
    If your sustainability story only looks good on the front end, the back end will come back to bite you.

    Exhibit C: Coca-Cola — The King of… Plastic Pollution

    Coca-Cola has been the world’s #1 plastic polluter for years. Not by a little but by a landslide.

    Coke keeps announcing sustainability goals.
    Consumers continue to find Coke bottles on every beach, from Mumbai to Miami.
    Boycotts keep happening like annual festivals.

    Lesson?
    When your product becomes part of the planet’s geography, people will eventually get pissed.

    Why This Is Good (Yes, Good)

    Boycotts sound extreme. Sometimes petty. Occasionally hilarious.
    But here’s the truth nobody wants to admit:

    Boycotts are forcing brands to upgrade their ethics.

    Brands don’t change because of morality.
    They change because of:

    • Falling sales
    • Tanking sentiment
    • PR teams yelling
    • Investors sweating
    • CEOs crying into their carbon-neutral pillows

    When people hit “unfollow” with their wallets, brands suddenly discover compassion.

    But… Are Boycotts Always Effective?

    Short answer: No.
    Long answer: Mostly no, but occasionally yes.

    Some boycotts fizzle out because attention spans are shorter than Instagram reels.

    Others trigger real transformations. Consumers forced LEGO to ditch oil giant partnerships. They also pressured Nestlé into shifting its sustainability commitments (though imperfectly).

    Boycotts don’t always work.
    But they always signal something important:

    The public is done with bullshit.

    The Sustainability POV Brands Need (but Hate)

    Brands love to say “we’re listening.”
    But here’s what consumers are actually yelling:

    1. Stop Greenwashing — If your ad looks greener than your supply chain, stop lying.
    2. Fix Your Back End — Audits, waste management, supply chains, labour policies… the stuff you never post about.
    3. Show Receipts — Real numbers. Real progress. Real timelines.
    4. Be Human — Admit mistakes. Commit to fixing them. No corporate poetry.
    5. Think Long-Term — Not “2025 sustainability goals.” Try something wild: permanent change.

    So What Can Brands Actually Learn?

    1. Sustainability is no longer a PR angle — it’s survival.

    Consumers expect it. Regulators demand it. Boycotts punish the lack of it.

    2. Transparency beats perfection.

    People forgive honesty faster than hypocrisy.

    3. If you don’t manage your footprint, the internet will do it for you.

    And trust me, its customer service is terrible.

    4. Fans are the new activists.

    And activists are your new brand guardians (or executioners).

    So… What Now?

    If you’re a brand:
    Stop treating sustainability like deodorant, something you spray on to smell better.
    Build it into your damn bones.

    If you’re a consumer:
    Pay attention. Vote with your money. Demand actual change.
    And maybe, just maybe, boycott with intention, not impulse.

    Because the future of sustainability won’t be defined by brands pretending to be good.
    It’ll be defined by people refusing to buy their bullshit.

    And honestly? That’s the best boycott of all.

  • Why Our Attention Spans Are Shrinking in the Digital Age

    Viral content these days feels like a chaotic soup of jump cuts. It includes fake reactions and TikTok dances. These should’ve never been invented in the first place.

    Once, virality was magic. Now it’s math.
    And not the fun kind, the “has anyone ever used trigonometry in real life?” kind.

    Welcome to the era of engineered chaos. Algorithms decide what deserves attention. Meanwhile, your brain quietly cries in the corner.

    1. Virality Has Become Industrialised, and You Can Tell

    Remember Charlie Bit My Finger?
    A kid bites another kid. The internet explodes. Simple. Pure. Adorable.

    Compare that with 2025’s viral hits:

    • “I Quit My Job to Live as a Pigeon for 30 Days”
    • “Boyfriend Reacts to Girlfriend Reacting to His Reaction”
    • “AI Makes 500 Versions of My Face Crying”

    Virality today is constructed, staged, or outright manufactured.

    Influencers now use tools that analyse which facial expressions increase watch time by 0.6 seconds. Entire “content farms” pump out hundreds of videos per day, optimised for you, the unsuspecting dopamine junkie.

    When creativity becomes an assembly line, authenticity dies faster than a meme in 2026.

    2. Our Attention Spans Are Shrinking (Yes, There’s Data)

    You’ve heard the goldfish comparison.
    But here’s a real stat:

    📉 The average viewer decides in just 1.7 seconds whether to keep watching a video.

    Meanwhile, platforms report:

    • The average TikTok session lasts 95 minutes
    • 70% of viewers never finish videos longer than 10 seconds
    • People scroll the equivalent height of the Eiffel Tower every day

    Of course, content is getting shorter.
    Of course, nuance is disappearing.
    Of course, we’re turning into overstimulated squirrels.

    Because if your video doesn’t assault the viewer’s senses within the first blink, it’s toast.

    3. Outrage = Free Organic Reach

    Take any recent viral drama:

    • A creator faked a breakup for views.
    • Someone stole someone’s recipe, sparking “Tortilla-Gate.”
    • One guy filmed himself whispering insults to squirrels.
    • That one woman who “cancelled pizza.”

    Outrage spreads fast because it hijacks the emotional brain.
    And platforms love emotion, any emotion.

    Anger? Great.
    Confusion? Even better.
    Mild irritation? Jackpot.

    The algorithm doesn’t care if you hate the content.
    It only cares that you stop scrolling.

    4. But Here’s the Twist: Not All Viral Content Is Bad

    To keep things balanced:

    Some viral content genuinely is creative, uplifting, educational, or hilarious.
    Without virality, we wouldn’t have:

    • Stunning citizen journalism
    • Viral fundraisers saving lives
    • Cultural moments that unite millions
    • Pandemic-era balcony singers
    • Real human stories amplified globally

    The problem isn’t virality itself.
    It’s the volume.
    It’s the pressure.
    It’s the race to out-shock last week’s shock.

    The more we chase virality, the cheaper the content becomes.

    5. The AI Explosion Is About to Flood Everything

    AI now creates:

    • Hyperreal fake influencers
    • Entire news channels
    • Emotion-optimized scripts
    • Virtual celebrities with 10M followers

    Soon, you won’t know if the viral video you love was created by a human. It might also be a neural network trained on every video you’ve ever paused for 0.2 seconds too long.

    The content ocean will get deeper.
    And murkier.
    And weirder.

    We’re approaching a world where authenticity is a luxury product.

    6. So What Actually Matters in This Mess?

    Weirdly enough: real human signals.

    As the internet gets louder, artificial, and algorithmic, the most valuable content will be:

    • Honest
    • Vulnerable
    • Imperfect
    • Thoughtful
    • Human

    Why?
    Because people are exhausted.
    Because synthetic content feels empty.
    Because depth stands out when surrounded by digital junk food.

    Ask yourself:

    When was the last time you watched something online that genuinely moved you instead of mildly distracting you?

    If you had to think longer than a few seconds… that’s the problem.

    So… What Do We Do? (Here’s the Actual Call to Action)

    No, you don’t need to delete social media and move to a cave.
    But you do need to take responsibility for what you choose to feed your brain.

    Try this:

    • Be intentional with your attention.
    • Stop rewarding content that insults your intelligence.
    • Share things that matter, not things that shock.
    • Support creators who value honesty over virality.
    • Ask yourself daily:
      Is this content making me better, or just busier?

    Because the future of viral content isn’t shaped by algorithms.
    It’s shaped by us, by what we click, what we share, and what we value.

    Virality isn’t dying.
    But maybe, just maybe, our standards should stop dying with it.

  • Why Viral Fame Is Just an Algorithmic Trick

    We live in an era where fame is no longer earned — it’s algorithmically assigned. One day, you’re a regular human buying boring groceries. The next day, a clip of you slipping on a banana peel gets 2.6 million views. People are asking if you “take collab offers.”

    And somehow… we’ve convinced ourselves this is influence.

    Spoiler: A lot of it is smoke, mirrors, and dopamine on steroids.

    Let’s break down the illusion.

    An infographic titled 'The Illusion of Influence' explaining the complexities of social media stardom, including points on accidental fame, the difference between engagement and impact, issues of authenticity, platform profits, and the fame trap, with reflective questions for the audience.

    1. Stardom by Accident: How the Algorithm Manufactures “Influencers”

    We used to look up to rockstars, athletes, and people who cured diseases. Now? We follow strangers who unbox shampoo.

    Not because they’re experts.

    Not because they’re special.

    Because the algorithm required something new to show at 3 a.m.

    • Over 50 million people worldwide now consider themselves “creators.”
    • Only about 4–5% make even a modest living from it.
    • The majority? They’re stuck in content purgatory, posting daily for audiences who barely remember their names.

    Question for you:
    How many creators do you follow that you couldn’t even recognise in a lineup?

    The algorithm doesn’t build influence — it builds familiarity.
    And familiarity feels like fame.

    But only for a moment.

    2. Engagement ≠ Impact: The Numbers Game We Keep Losing

    The internet has trained us to believe that numbers equal value:

    • 10,000 likes = “People love me.”
    • 100,000 followers = “I matter.”
    • 1 viral video = “My destiny is changing.”

    Except that most engagements are meaningless.

    Half the likes come from thumb-scrolling zombies.
    The rest come from bots, bored teenagers, or your mother pretending she understands “this influencer thing.”

    Look at any “viral star.”
    Most enjoy 15 minutes of visibility… and then vanish faster than your new-year gym motivation.

    Ask yourself:
    When was the last time a viral video actually changed your perspective? Did it affect anything besides trying a new dessert?

    3. The Performance of Authenticity: How We Fake “Realness” for Attention

    The biggest lie online is authenticity.

    Creators cry on camera — cut.
    Re-film the cry — cut.
    Add background music to the cry — perfect.

    Even “I woke up like this” looks effortlessly polished. It seems as if a film crew shot it with soft lighting and a skincare deal.

    We’ve turned vulnerability into a branding strategy.
    Honesty in a niche.

    And the audience?
    We applaud because we crave something that feels real.

    Here’s a stat no one likes to mention:
    92% of consumers trust influencers. Still, they trusted them less than five years ago.

    We can smell the fakeness now.
    We just scroll past it anyway because we’re bored.

    4. The Economics of Illusion: How Platforms Profit While Creators Chase Shadows

    Social media doesn’t care about your influence.
    It cares about your output.

    Your “influence” is just an ingredient in their revenue machine.

    You post.
    People watch.
    They show ads.
    They get richer.
    You get a dopamine hit and maybe a free protein bar.

    Creators often say, “I’m building a community.”
    Platforms say, “You’re building us money.”

    Which leads to the biggest irony:
    Most influencers aren’t influencing.
    They’re being influenced by the algorithm.

    Question:
    Are you posting because you want to… or because the platform punishes you if you don’t?

    5. The Psychological Trap: Why We Keep Falling for the Fame Fantasy

    Humans love shortcuts:

    • Fast food
    • Fast entertainment
    • Fast fame

    Social media feels like a cheat code to validation.

    But here’s the truth bomb:

    The wish to be seen has replaced the wish to matter.

    And the gap between the two?
    That’s where our anxiety lives.

    We chase numbers hoping they will fill the emotional gaps in our lives.
    But numbers are terrible therapists.

    So… What Do We Do With All This?

    Simple: Stop outsourcing your worth to the algorithm.

    Here’s a practical mindset shift:

    • Follow creators who actually teach, inspire, or challenge you.
    • Create because it fulfills you, not because it “performs.”
    • Recognise the difference between real influence and digital noise.

    Ask yourself:

    If social media disappeared tomorrow, what part of your identity would still stay?

    That’s the real measure of influence.

    The Call to Action

    Before you scroll to your next hit of dopamine:

    • Think about your own online habits.
    • Notice who you follow and why.
    • Question what “influence” means to you.
    • Share this with someone who lives and dies by their metrics.

    Because influence isn’t measured in likes.
    It’s measured in what remains when the screen turns off.

  • 7 Toxic Advertising Trends to Leave Behind

    I love advertising. I work in it. I breathe it. I’ve even defended it in arguments where I probably should’ve walked away and saved my blood pressure. But even I can admit that the industry has developed some truly horrifying habits. These are habits that need to be left behind, buried, and cremated. Their ashes should be scattered somewhere far from any marketing department.

    If we don’t act, we will continue making ads. These ads will insult the intelligence of the people we claim to understand.

    So here it is: the list of advertising trends we need to break up with — permanently.

    1. The “Purpose” That Doesn’t Actually Have a Purpose

    Every brand now wants to “change the world.” Even a cereal brand will drop a 3-minute film about inner strength and social unity. And look, I’m not against purpose. I’m against fake purpose, the kind that has no relationship to the product, the company, or reality.

    At my old job, I once sat through a client briefing. They said, “We want to take a stand on sustainable living.” The product? Plastic-wrapped chips. Plastic that looks like it can survive nuclear war.

    I remember thinking, You know what else should be sustainable? The logic in this room.

    We need to leave behind a performative purpose. If your brand can’t walk the walk, don’t make a film pretending it’s Usain Bolt.

    2. The Obsession With “Viral” Anything

    Every client wants a “viral video.” It’s like saying, “Make me famous,” but with worse expectations and better snacks. Virality isn’t a strategy; it’s luck wrapped in delusion.

    I once had a brand ask for “a funny ad that everyone in India will share.” They didn’t care about the message, the fit, or even the audience. Just shareability.
    That campaign died before it even reached the PPT stage.

    Here’s the truth: You can’t manufacture viral. But you can manufacture relevance. And that’s a much healthier goal.

    3. “Gen Z Will Love This”… No, They Won’t

    There is nothing more painful than watching 45-year-old executives approve “Gen Z language.”
    Bro, no. They’re not saying “bro” anymore. By the time you put slang in a campaign, it’s already retired.

    I’ve been guilty of this too. Once, I slid “vibe check” into a copy deck, thinking I was being cool. The intern on our team laughed so hard she had to mute herself. Humbling moment.

    Gen Z doesn’t want brands to talk like them. They want brands to understand them. Big difference.

    4. Data Without Humanity

    We’re drowning in dashboards. Every meeting is a festival of CTRs, CPMs, CVRs, and other alphabet soups. But here’s what nobody wants to admit:
    Data with no soul produces ads with no impact.

    I’ve worked on campaigns where the targeting was genius, but the idea was a hollow skeleton. It’s like baking a cake with perfect measurements but forgetting sugar. Technically correct. Practically useless.

    Let’s leave behind the trend of worshipping data like it’s a god. It’s a tool. A powerful one. But still a tool. The human insight should lead, not follow.

    5. Over-Creativity That Misses the Point Entirely

    There’s creativity, and then there’s “We made something only 12 people will understand.”

    Advertising used to solve problems. Now, half the time it feels like we’re trying to win Cannes by confusing the audience into thinking we’re smart.

    I once pitched an ad so metaphorical, even I didn’t fully understand it by the end. It was supposed to be poetic. It ended up being nonsense. The client rejected it instantly.
    And honestly, I deserved it.

    A simple, clear idea beats an overly complex masterpiece every single time.

    6. Cramming Every Trend Into One Campaign

    Metaverse? Influencers? AR filters? Sustainability? Feminism? AI?
    No problem, let’s do ALL of them in one campaign.

    I’ve seen decks that look like someone Googled “marketing trends 2025” and copy-pasted the entire list into the strategy.

    Trends are tools, not personality traits. Not every campaign needs to be an AI-powered, blockchain-integrated, influencer-led harmony workshop.

    Sometimes, you just need a good headline and a good placement. Revolutionary, I know.

    7. Endless “We Care” Advertising

    I swear, if I hear one more brand say, “In these unprecedented times…”. I will personally invent new precedents out of spite.

    People don’t want brands to constantly remind them they care. They want brands to prove they care, quietly, consistently, and through real action.

    I saw a brand spend more on its “we support frontline workers” campaign than it donated to actual frontline workers. That’s not caring. That’s PR yoga, and everyone can see the stretch marks.

    So Where Do We Go From Here?

    Advertising at its best is human, honest, useful, and occasionally brilliant. But we don’t get there by recycling the same gimmicks and pretending they’re strategies.

    We get there by:

    • Saying no to fake purpose
    • Focusing on relevance over virality
    • Speaking to people, not trends
    • Balancing data with emotion
    • Simplifying relentlessly
    • Choosing trends intentionally
    • Acting instead of pretending

    Basically, stop being fake and start being real. Like therapy… but with better visuals.

    As someone working in this industry every day, I’ve learned this the hard way. The best advertising isn’t loud. It’s true.

    We leave behind these tired trends. Maybe then, we’ll get back to making work we’re actually proud of.